page contents
  • The Supreme Court on 19 April revived the 25-year-old trial in the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid dispute by allowing fresh charges of criminal conspiracy against Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders L.K. Advani, Murali Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharti and 13 others.

    A bench comprising justices P.C. Ghose and Rohinton Nariman also directed transfer of cases from a court in Rae Bareilly to a special court in Lucknow that is also hearing certain related cases on the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition issue.

    The apex court also directed that the trial must conclude in 2 years without adjourning the case. The court also said that the special judge will not be transferred till the trial is completed.

    Following is the chronology of events in the Ayodhya-Babri Masjid dispute:-

    ■ 1528: A mosque is built on the site by Mughal emperor Babar which Hindus allege to be the birth place of Lord Ram and where a temple earlier existed.


     ■ 1853: First recorded incidents of communal violence at the disputed site take place.

    ■ 1859: British officials erect a fence to separate the places of worships, allowing the inner court to be used by Muslims and the outer court by Hindus.

    ■ 1885: Mahant Raghubir Das files a suit seeking permission to build a canopy on Ram chabootra but his plea was rejected a year after by the Faizabad district court.

    ■ 1949: Idol of Lord Ram surfaces inside mosque. Muslims claim that it was kept there by the Hindus. Muslims protest, and both parties file civil suits. The government proclaims the premises a disputed area and locks the gates.

    ■ 18 January 1950: First title suit is filed by Gopal Singh Visharad asking for the right to worship the idols installed at ‘Asthan Janmabhoomi´. The court restrained the removal of idols and allowed the worship to continue.

    ■ 24 April 1950: The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed against the injunction order.

    ■ 1950: Ramchandra Paramhans files another suit, but withdraws later.

    ■ 1959: Nirmohi Akhara enters the fray and files the third suit, seeking possession of the site, doing away with the court-appointed receiver. It claims itself to be the custodian of the spot at which Ram was supposedly born.

    ■ 18 December 1961: UP Sunni Central Board of Waqfs moves in to claim possession of the mosque and adjoining land.

    ■ 1986: On a plea of Hari Shanker Dubey, a district judge directs Masjid gates to be unlocked to allow ‘darshan’. Muslims set up Babri Masjid Action Committee.

    ■ 1989: A fresh suit is filed by former VHP vice-president Deoki Nandan Agarwala in the name of Lord Ram for declaration of the title and possession in its favour at the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court.

    ■ 23 October 1989: All the four suits, pending before a Faizabad court transferred to a special bench of the HC.

    ■ 1989: VHP lays foundations of a Ram temple on land adjacent to the disputed mosque.

    ■ 1990: VHP volunteers partially damage the mosque. Prime Minister Chandra Shekhar tries to resolve the dispute through negotiations, which fail the next year.

    ■ 1991: BJP comes to power in Uttar Pradesh with Kalyan Singh as chief minister.

    ■ 6 December 1992: This was the turning point of the entire dispute when Babri mosque was torn down by supporters of the VHP, the Shiv Sena and the BJP, prompting nationwide communal riots between Hindus and Muslims in which more than 2,000 people die.

    ■ October 1993 : CBI files composite charge sheet accusing Advani and others of conspiracy.

    ■ December 1993: Two FIRs filed in the case. One against unknown karsevaks for demolition of the mosque. The other named BJP leaders Advani, M M Joshi and others for allegedly giving ‘communal’ speeches before demolition.

    ■ 4 May 2001: Special CBI court drops proceedings against accused including Advani, Joshi, Uma Bharti, Bal Thackeray and others.

    ■ January 2003: Archaeologists begin a Allahabad high court-ordered survey to find out whether a temple to Lord Ram did exist on the site. Meanwhile, PM Vajpayee sets up an Ayodhya cell in his office and appoints a senior official, Shatrughna Singh, to hold talks with Hindu and Muslim leaders.

    ■ February 2003: BJP rules out committing itself to the construction of a temple in its election manifesto for UP assembly elections. VHP confirms deadline of 15 March to begin construction. Hundreds of volunteers converge on site.
    Meanwhile, in a supposedly related incident at least 58 people are killed in an attack on a train in Godhra which was carrying Hindu activists returning from Ayodhya.

    ■ April 2003: Three High Court judges begin hearings on determining who owns the religious site.

    ■ 31 August 2003: All India Muslim Personal Law Board announced it would challenge the ASI report.
    Earlier, the ASI survey said there is evidence of a temple beneath the mosque, but Muslims dispute the findings. Vajpayee says at the funeral of Hindu activist Ramchandra Das Paramhans that he will fulfil the dying man’s wishes and build a temple at Ayodhya. However, he hopes the courts and negotiations will solve the issue.

    ■ September 2003: A court rules that seven Hindu leaders should stand trial for inciting the destruction of the Babri Mosque, but no charges are brought against Advani, then deputy prime minister, who was also at the site in 1992.

    ■ 2 November 2004: CBI challenges before the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court, the dropping of proceedings against BJP leaders on technical grounds. Court issues notices.

    ■ July 2005: Suspected Islamic militants attack the disputed site, using a jeep laden with explosives to blow a hole in the wall of the complex. Security forces kill five people they say are militants, and a sixth who was not immediately identified.

    ■ June 2009: The Liberhan commission investigating events leading up to the mosque’s demolition submits its report—17 years after it began its inquiry. Its contents are not made public.

    ■ 20 May 2010: High court dismisses plea. Says no merit in CBI’s revision petition.

    ■ July 2010: Bench reserves its judgement and asks all parties to solve the issue amicably. But no one is keen.

    ■ 8 September 2010: The High Court announces verdict would be delivered on 24 September.

    ■ 14 September 2010: A writ is filed to defer the judgement but is subsequently rejected by the high court.

    ■ 28 September 2010: Supreme Court rejects petition for deferment and gives the go-ahead to the Allahabad high court to deliver the judgement on the Ayodhya title issue. The high court chooses 30 September as verdict day.

    ■ February 2011: CBI moves Supreme Court against high court order.

    ■ 3 September 2013: SC advanced by about two months the date of hearing in the Babri Masjid demolition case against L.K. Advani and 19 others after the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) pleaded for an early hearing which was not opposed by the senior BJP leader.

    ■ 31 March 2015: SC issues notices to senior BJP leaders, including L.K.Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharati and Kalyan Singh, on a plea not to drop charges of criminal conspiracy against them in the Babri Masjid demolition case.

    ■ 6 March 2017: SC indicates it may consider reviving conspiracy charge against the BJP leaders in Babri Masjid demolition case.

    ■ 21 March 2017: SC suggests fresh attempts to resolve Ayodhya dispute.

    ■ 6 April 2017: SC favours time-bound completion of trial in the case and reserves order on CBI’s plea.

    ■ 19 April 2017: SC restores criminal conspiracy charge against leaders including Advani, Joshi and union cabinet minister Uma Bharti in the case and clubs the trial in the matter pending against VIPs and karsevaks.

Categories: Politics


Aditya Vikram Singh · April 20, 2017 at 4:36 am

Awesome and really helpful inform

    bickerhub · April 20, 2017 at 4:45 am

    Thank you so much sir!! Keep supporting Cheers!

superoa · April 21, 2017 at 2:41 am

la phrase Excellente et est opportun

    bickerhub · April 21, 2017 at 5:40 am

    thank u sir, keep supporting
    cheers · May 24, 2017 at 6:18 am

I cluld not refrain from commenting. Perfectly written! · May 24, 2017 at 12:58 pm

There’s defnately a lot to find out about this topic. I love all the points
you made. · August 4, 2017 at 9:46 am

Hindu groups later requested modifications to the Babri Mosque, and drew up plans for a new grand Temple with Government permissions; riots between Hindu and Muslim groups took place as a result.

86Jovita · August 24, 2017 at 3:26 am

I see you don’t monetize your page, don’t waste your traffic, you can earn additional cash every month because
you’ve got high quality content. If you want to know how to make extra bucks, search for:
best adsense alternative Wrastain’s tools

ToryX · August 24, 2017 at 10:52 pm

I have noticed that your blog needs some fresh content. Writing manually
takes a lot of time, but there is tool for this boring
task, search for: unlimited content Wrastain’s tools

OllieX · September 8, 2017 at 7:26 pm

I see your page needs some fresh articles. Writing manually takes
a lot of time, but there is tool for this time consuming task,
search for; Wrastain’s tools for content

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts



Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav ( Hussain Mubarak Patel) is an Indian national arrested in Balochistan, Pakistan, over charges of terrorism and spying for India’s intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW). The Pakistani government states that he is Read more…


Reason behind success of BJP, find it out what Subramanian Swamy says

BJP leader Subramanian Swamy feels that the saffron party’s aggressive push for its Hindutva agenda has made people feel empowered and thus it has been doing good in elections. In Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s leadership, Read more…


Samajwadi Party to split, a new turn Indian Politics

Former Uttar Pradesh minister Shivpal Yadav on 5 May confirmed that he was taking hand back from the Samajwadi Party and starting his own party and former chief minister Mulayam Singh Yadav. A day after Read more…